Meeting Summary of the
Oahu Metropolitan Planning Organization
CITIZEN ADVISORY
COMMITTEE
Wednesday, June 16, 2010, 3:30 p.m.
Mayor’s Conference Room 301,
530
Members Present:
|
Land Use Research Foundation |
David Arakawa, Chair |
|
NB #34 Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale |
Michael Golojuch, Vice Chair |
|
Mary Protheroe |
|
|
American Planning Association Hawaii |
John Valera |
|
American Society of Civil Engineers |
Tiffany Hamada |
|
Citizens for a Fair ADA Ride |
Ronald Pike |
|
Committee for Balanced Transportation |
Joseph Magaldi |
|
E Noa Corporation |
|
|
Eye of the Pacific |
Twila Lai |
|
Hawaii Bicycling League |
Janice Marsters |
|
Hawaii Centers for Independent Living |
Charlene Ota |
|
Hawaii Teamsters and Allied Workers, Local 996 |
Michael Costa |
|
Honolulu Community Action Program |
Kristina Copeland |
|
Hui Kupuna VIP |
Louise Horio |
|
Institute of Transportation Engineers |
I. Robert Nehmad |
|
Leeward Oahu Transportation Management Association |
Debbie Luning |
|
Mestizo Association |
Arvid Youngquist |
|
NB #01 Hawaii Kai |
Greg Knudsen |
|
NB #02 Kuliouou-Kalani Iki |
Linda Starr |
|
NB #03 Waialae-Kahala |
Lester Fukuda |
|
NB #05 Diamond Head-Kapahulu-Saint Louis Heights |
Bert Narita |
|
NB #07 Manoa |
|
|
NB #09 Waikiki |
Michael Peters |
|
NB #10 Makiki-Lower Punchbowl-Tantalus |
Charles |
|
NB #11 Ala Moana-Kakaako |
David Hilea, Jr. |
|
NB #13 Downtown |
Tom Smyth |
|
NB #21 Pearl City |
Cruz J. Vina, Jr. |
|
NB #22 Waipahu |
Blaine Tsugawa |
|
NB #26 Wahiawa-Whitmore Village |
Joseph |
|
NB #29 Kahaluu |
David Henkin |
|
NB #35 Mililani Mauka-Launani Valley |
|
|
Waikiki Residents Association |
Daisy Murai |
Members
Absent (Reps):
|
Castle & Cooke Homes Hawaii |
Dean Minakami |
|
League of Women Voters |
Piilani Kaopuiki |
|
NB #08 McCully-Moiliili |
Ron Lockwood |
|
NB #12 Nuuanu-Punchbowl |
James Marn |
|
NB #18 Aliamanu-Salt Lake-Foster Village |
Lorene Godfrey |
|
NB #23 Ewa |
Coby M. Lynn |
|
NB #25 Mililani-Waipio-Melemanu |
David Aki |
|
NB #30 Kaneohe |
Glenn Ida |
|
North Shore Chamber of Commerce |
|
|
Pacific Resource Partnership |
Josh Magno |
|
Tax Foundation of Hawaii |
Lowell Kalapa |
|
|
|
Guests Present:
|
Jackie Boland |
AARP |
|
Julia Belesario |
Citizens for a Fair ADA Ride |
|
Tammy Mori |
Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) |
|
Rachel Roper |
HDOT |
|
Ken Tatsuguchi |
HDOT |
|
Nick Poulos |
Honolulu Department of Transportation Services (DTS) |
|
Chris Sayers |
DTS |
|
Rose Pou |
Hui Kupuna VIP |
|
Nancy Nishikawa |
Kimura International |
|
Robert Whitaker |
NB #7 Manoa |
|
Bob R. Smith |
NB #24 Waianae Coast |
|
James K. Manaku, Sr. |
NB #36 Nanakuli-Maili |
|
Doug Chun |
Office of Council Services |
|
Tom Berg |
Office of Representative Kymberly Pine |
Vice Chair Michael Golojuch called the
meeting to order at 3:34 p.m. Chair
David Arakawa arrived at 3:40 p.m.
1.A. “Bike Plan
Chair Arakawa
introduced Ken Tatsuguchi, Program Manager,
Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) and Nancy Nishikawa, Kimura
International. Mr. Tatsuguchi introduced
the project consultant, Nancy Nishikawa and Rachel Roper, project manager for
the Bike Plan Hawaii Phase 2. Bike Plan
Hawaii was finalized in 2003 and is ready for an update and reprioritization of
projects in the Plan. This process will
involve project assessment reports, a reevaluation of the project priorities
and criteria used in that prioritization, and consultation with stakeholders
statewide.
Once the stakeholder meetings have all been
completed, the two or three projects receiving the highest priority will be
moving forward. To assist with identifying
priority projects, the project assessment reports will contain cost estimates;
challenges, such as right-of-way acquisitions required; and the scope of the
project.
Discussion Highlights:
[Unless noted
otherwise, questions were answered by Mr. Tatsuguchi.]
·
In response to a question by Linda Starr: Stakeholders
for Bike Plan
·
In response to a question by
· In response to a question by Chair Arakawa: The criteria and weighting of those criteria have been approached differently on a regional or district level.
·
In response to a question by
· In response to a question by Blaine Tsugawa: There is no current listing of the projects that have been implemented since the 2003 Bike Plan was developed. Mr. Tsugawa commented that the presentation was lacking significant information.
· In response to a comment made by David Henkin regarding a bicycle project along Kahekili Highway which has funding, community support, and is consistent with the Kahaluu Master Plan, Mr. Tatsuguchi said that Bike Plan Hawaii is for unbudgeted projects. Since this project has funding, it would not be included in this Bike Plan. He will look for information regarding that project.
· In response to a question by Mary Protheroe: Dozens of projects in the original plan have been completed and remaining projects are being reprioritized. Project assessment reports will be developed to help expedite remaining projects moving through the process.
· In response to a question by Tom Smyth: Bike Plan projects may receive a higher priority as a result of being eligible for federal stimulus monies. Tammy Mori, HDOT Administrative Assistant for Public Affairs, stated that those involved in the planning process are not always aware of the design and construction phases of projects. All new road construction will accommodate all users of the roadway.
· In response to a question by Tom Heinrich: CAC members and the community at large may become involved by attending the Oahu stakeholders meeting tomorrow at 2:00 p.m. in the Pan Am Building on Kapiolani Boulevard.
· In response to a question by David Hilea: Public outreach is a challenge. For this effort, bicycling groups have been contacted and relied upon for spreading the word about meetings.
· In response to a question by Tom Berg: Information regarding the implementation of the Leeward Bikeway is outside of the purview of planning efforts.
· A comment by Greg Knudsen expressed displeasure with the lack of information and the unproductive use of the CAC’s time.
· In response to a question by Arvid Youngquuist: Since the passage of Proposition 8 in the City Charter, the City Bicycle Coordinator, Chris Sayers, has been consulted and invited to the stakeholders meeting. The State is looking to enhance connectivity by looking at the Oahu Bike Plan and the entire network on non-State facilities.
·
In response to a question by Jackie Boland: The
bicycle projects in this plan will not be included in the update of the
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for FFYs 2011-2014. The projects may be placed in the TIP through
revisions of the TIP.
1. B. “Meet and Greet”
Chair Arakawa introduced the new
[Unless noted
otherwise, questions were answered by Mr. Gibson.]
· In response to a question by Ms. Starr: Getting to know local people and the culture will be an important aspect of his job as Executive Director of the OahuMPO.
· In response to a question by Joe Magaldi: After spending the last 33 years in North Dakota, Mr. Gibson felt the Executive Director position was a perfect opportunity to broaden his horizons and create new experiences. Priorities for the OahuMPO are to ensure fiscal responsibility as a public agency. As he learns more about the operations and relationships within and around the MPO, improvements and changes develop.
·
In response to an offer by Ms. Boland on behalf
of AARP and One Voice for
· In response to a question by Mr. Hilea: Meeting people at various functions will be an important tool for becoming acquainted with local customs and performing well in his position as Executive Director.
·
In response to a question by Mr. Youngquist: Mr.
Gibson has taken the Amtrak train to various spots in the upper Midwest,
including
· In response to a question by Mr. Smyth: Neighborhood Board involvement is and will be an integral part of the operations at the OahuMPO.
· In response to a question by Louise Horio: Transit is Mr. Gibson’s current mode of transportation; he would be happy to ride TheBus and TheHandiVan with Ms. Horio.
· In response to a question by Mr. Berg: The expansion of the Policy Committee to include a member of the CAC and the TAC will be explored.
· A comment by Ms. Protheroe stated that frustration was evident regarding the difficulty in getting current, accurate, and detailed information. She offered a comment prepared by AARP on the draft FFYs 2011-2014 TIP in an effort to get pertinent and comprehensive information in a format that is approachable and understandable. Mr. Gibson eagerly looks forward to involving citizens in the transportation decision-making process. Facilitation of that process is very important – a challenge he will take seriously.
· A suggestion offered by Mr. Dinell was to look at giving credibility and a level of importance to the CAC by looking into citizen representation on the Policy Committee and integration into the process. Mr. Gibson replied that citizen involvement is a sacred duty of the MPO and is important to him.
· Mr. Magaldi expressed his pleasure and offered a warm welcome.
· In response to a question by Chair Arakawa: The Policy Committee did respond to the CAC’s concerns at their last meeting and absolutely treated their concerns with due respect. As the Executive Director of the OahuMPO, Mr. Gibson is tasked with following the direction of the Policy Committee as it relates to the OahuMPO.
2.
Marian Yasuda announced the following:
o Approved the FY 2011 Overall Work Program,
o Accepted the CAC membership application from Ala Moana-Kakaako Neighborhood Board #11,
o Heard a presentation on the draft FFYs 2011-2014 TIP, and
o Deferred the proposed amendment to the Bylaws of the CAC
Chair Arakawa explained the deferral of the CAC bylaws amendment by the Policy Committee. The Policy Committee seemed favorable toward the amendment to the bylaws, but requested that the Attorney General concur with the Deputy Attorney General’s letter regarding the CAC and the Sunshine Law prior to acting on the bylaws amendment.
3. Announcements
Chair Arakawa announced that surveys on future presentation topics and on meeting dates and locations are available today. The surveys will be emailed or mailed to those members not in attendance.
4. Approval of the May 19, 2010 Meeting Minutes
Hearing no objections, the approval of the meeting minutes was tabled.
5. Other Business
Chair Arakawa introduced Ms.
Protheroe from AARP to speak about the comments provided to the
· The current TIP format does not provide adequate information for informed review,
· Funding omissions are questioned, and
· Information is necessary for the CAC to be an effective advisory body and meaningful participants in the process.
Mr. Dinell moved and
Mr. Magaldi seconded that the AARP submission be referred to the staff for
consideration in incorporating those changes and presenting the TIP to the CAC.
The motion passed unanimously.
The AARP comments will be an agenda item for the July CAC meeting. Ms. Yasuda will distribute the AARP’s comments to the entire CAC.
The meeting was adjourned at 4:50 p.m.