Meeting Summary of the
Oahu Metropolitan Planning Organization
CITIZEN ADVISORY
COMMITTEE
Wednesday, March 17, 2010, 3:30 p.m.
Mayor’s Conference Room 301,
530
Members Present:
|
Land Use Research Foundation |
David Arakawa, Chair |
|
American Planning Association Hawaii |
John Valera |
|
Castle & Cooke Homes Hawaii |
Ray Kunishige |
|
Citizens for a Fair ADA Ride |
Ronald Pike |
|
Committee for Balanced Transportation |
Joseph Magaldi |
|
E Noa Corporation |
|
|
Eye of the Pacific |
Twila Lai |
|
Hawaii Centers for Independent Living |
Charlene Ota |
|
Hawaii Teamsters and Allied Workers, Local 996 |
Michael Costa |
|
Honolulu Community Action Program |
Kristina Copeland |
|
Hui Kupuna VIP |
Rose Pou |
|
Institute of Transportation Engineers |
I. Robert Nehmad |
|
Leeward Oahu Transportation Management Association |
Debbie Luning |
|
Mestizo Association |
Arvid Youngquist |
|
NB #02 Kuliouou-Kalani Iki |
Linda Starr |
|
NB #05 Diamond Head-Kapahulu-Saint Louis Heights |
Bert Narita |
|
NB #07 Manoa |
Tom Heinrich |
|
NB #08 McCully-Moiliili |
Ron Lockwood |
|
NB #10 Makiki-Lower Punchbowl-Tantalus |
Charles |
|
NB #13 Downtown |
Tom Smyth |
|
NB #18 Aliamanu-Salt Lake-Foster Village |
Lorene Godfrey |
|
NB #21 Pearl City |
Cruz J. Vina, Jr. |
|
NB #22 Waipahu |
Blaine Tsugawa |
|
NB #25 Mililani-Waipio-Melemanu |
Dick Poirier |
|
NB #26 Wahiawa-Whitmore Village |
Joseph |
|
NB #30 Kaneohe |
Glenn Ida |
|
NB #35 Mililani Mauka-Launani Valley |
|
|
Tax Foundation of Hawaii |
Randall Hiu |
|
Waikiki Residents Association |
Daisy Murai |
Members
Absent (Reps):
|
AARP |
Mary Protheroe |
|
American Society of Civil Engineers |
Tiffany Hamada |
|
Hawaii Bicycling League |
Janice Marsters |
|
League of Women Voters |
Piilani Kaopuiki |
|
NB #01 Hawaii Kai |
Greg Knudsen |
|
NB #03 Waialae-Kahala |
Lester Fukuda |
|
NB #09 Waikiki |
Robert Finley |
|
NB #12 Nuuanu-Punchbowl |
James Marn |
|
NB #20 Aiea |
Carl Jacobs |
|
NB #23 Ewa |
Coby M. Lynn |
|
NB #29 Kahaluu |
Ken LeVasseur |
|
NB #34 Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale |
Michael Golojuch, Vice Chair |
|
North Shore Chamber of Commerce |
|
|
Pacific Resource Partnership |
Josh Magno |
|
|
|
Guests Present:
|
Kevin Killeen |
Citizen |
|
Christine Absher |
Citizens for a Fair ADA Ride |
|
Kirk Caldwell |
City and |
|
Ginny Bisho |
Department of Transportation Services |
|
Nicholas Poulos |
DTS |
|
Scott Ishikawa |
DTS |
|
Pat Lee |
DTS |
|
Janet Inamine |
McCully resident |
|
Robert Whitaker |
NB #7 Manoa |
|
David Hilea, Jr. |
NB #11 Ala Moana |
|
Brandon Lau |
NB #14 Liliha |
|
Dale White |
NB #14 Liliha |
|
Jane Sugimura |
NB #20 Aiea |
|
Bob R. Smith |
NB #24 Waianae Coast |
Chair David Arakawa called the meeting to
order at 3:30 p.m. With no objections,
an agenda item was taken out of order.
1.A. “Draft FY 2011 Overall Work Program (OWP)”
Chair Arakawa introduced
1.B. “
Chair Arakawa introduced Kirk Caldwell, Managing Director, City and County of Honolulu.
Mr. Caldwell spoke about Honolulu’s previous attempts to implement mass transit. He stated that growth on the Ewa plain has created a greater need for transit, providing an alternative mode for commuting to downtown Honolulu and beyond. He also emphasized the need to integrate bicycles into the transit system.
Mr. Caldwell explained how the Honolulu Rail Transit Project will
stimulate the economy, create jobs, and help the State climb out of the
recession. The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) recently provided budgeted $55 million for the next
planning stage of the project, which is a demonstration of their faith in the
project. Three Two auditing firms
have reviewed the financial plan for the Rail Project at the request of the FTA
and have determined that the plan is sound.
Mr. Caldwell emphasized that the purpose of an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) is to identify and address impacts of the proposed project on
other agencies’ interests, the environment, stakeholders, and the public. The EIS does not consider any technologies or
alignments other than that which was identified as the preferred alternative by
the City Council. The financial plan of
the Rail Project has no relevance to the acceptance or rejections of the Draft
Final EIS.
Mr. Caldwell addressed the concerns of the Federal Aviation Administration regarding the alignment of the Rail Project near the airport. The parties involved with these concerns are currently in discussion and will continue until there is resolution.
Discussion Highlights:
[Unless noted otherwise,
questions were answered by Mr. Caldwell.]
· In response to a question by Arvid Youngquist: Statistics regarding accidents involving sealed transit systems on a fixed rail, such as Bay Area Rapid Transit, can be researched and considered for inclusion into future presentations.
·
In response to a question by Linda Starr: Twenty
Ten thousand jobs will be created by building the system; 4,000 of those will
be direct construction jobs. Transit-Oriented
Development will boost economic opportunities around the stations. It is estimated that $20 billion worth of
work will be created by this project by construction around the stations.
·
In response to a question by Twila Lai: The Rail
Project planning and design is compliant with the Americans with Disabilities
Act Guidelines. Scott Ishikawa, DTS
Rapid Transit Division, stated that he continually works with seniors and
persons with disabilities to ensure that all their accessibility needs
are addressed. Some specific features
will be elevator and escalator access from both sides of the road, audible
announcements for train arrivals and departures, 1½ inches gaps between the
station platform and the train, sensors to stop doors from closing if boarding
has not completed, and tactile features at the boarding areas.
·
In response to a question by Joe Magaldi: Sound
generated by the Rail System should be no louder than current levels heard
on the busy streets of Honolulu a passing City bus.
·
In response to a question by Daisy Murai: Mr.
Ishikawa responded that the financial plan does rail system will include
the 40-acre maintenance facility, a control center facility, the fixed
guideway, the planning and construction of the 21 transit stations, as well as
75 train cars. The system will be
automated (driverless), which means lower operating costs.
1.C. “Draft Amendment to the Bylaws of the CAC”
Chair Arakawa introduced Tom Smyth, Bylaws Subcommittee Chair.
Mr. Smyth provided an overview of the recommended amendment to the Bylaws of the CAC. The significant proposed amendments change the operational period for the CAC from the State fiscal year to the calendar year. Following a legal opinion received from the Attorney General’s office, the quorum for the CAC has been proposed to change to 30 percent of the total membership.
A motion was
made by Mr. Youngquist and seconded by Ms. Lai to approve the Bylaws amendment
and transmit it to the Policy Committee for approval.
Discussion Highlights:
· In response to a question by Kristina Copeland: Mr. Smyth explained that an item can be added to the agenda by two-thirds of the members present. The section stating, “Before a CAC vote can be taken during a regular or special meeting, the subject matter shall be first identified on the agenda in sufficient detail” has been deleted.
· Dick Poirier had three suggestions to offer:
1. This approval by the CAC was not necessary;
2. If the Bylaws are going to identify the quorum, it should be zero; and
3. The letter received by the OahuMPO is not a formal legal opinion. The Policy Committee should be informed that there are problems with this letter; and a suggestion should be given that they request a formal opinion from the Attorney General.
Chair Arakawa suggested a friendly amendment to the motion to include in the transmission to the Policy Committee the Attorney General’s letter and a letter written by Mr. Poirier informing the Policy Committee of concerns by some CAC members.
Mr. Youngquist and Ms. Lai agreed to the friendly amendment.
Chair Arakawa restated the motion: “Approve the Bylaws amendment to go forward to the Policy Committee, attaching the Attorney General’s letter and a letter from one of the CAC members stating concerns and questions.”
The motion was unanimously approved.
2. Approval of the February 17, 2010 Meeting
Minutes
Hearing no objections, the approval of the minutes was deferred until the April meeting due to time constraints.
3. Other Business
There was no other business.
4.
Hearing no objections, this agenda item was deferred until the April meeting due to time constraints.
4. Announcements
There were no announcements.
The meeting was adjourned at 4:45 p.m.